Jul
10th

German court clears WiFi theft victims of responsibility for copyright infringment of others

Posted by

According to a decision by the Frankfurt Court of Appeal the victims of WiFi theft can’t be held responsible for the thieves’ copyright infringement. The same court that previously ruled parents can’t be held responsible for the flle sharing activities of their children overturned a lower court’s decision, and potentially dealt a blow to the campaign being waged by a UK lawfirm against several hundred people for alleged copyright infringement.

Lawyers at Davenport Lyons have been sending out letters to alleged UK file sharers pointing out the German court ruling making individuals whose WiFi connection is used by others without authorization responsible for any infringement. They went on to point out that it was likely that decision would be echoed by UK courts. Don’t expect to see a similar claim about this new decision.

With the possible implications of the ruling don’t be surprised to see yet another round of arguments before things are decided for sure. Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers said “The future will show us what the highest court in Germany - the Bundesgerichtshof - says to this difficult question.”

Jun
19th

Student hackers’ group exposed after tip-off

Posted by

CHENNAI: Police on Tuesday arrested a college student for purchasing electronic goods online using credit card details of card holders from across the world.

T Bharathwaj Purohit (20), a resident of MKB Nagar and a member of a community of hackers, had been buying electronic goods online using other people’s credit cards since April.

Police recovered an electric guitar, a printer, an LCD TV, a digital camera, a weighing scale, a mobile and a laptop all worth Rs 3 lakh, and Rs 38,500 in cash from him. Purohit met Charu Sharma of Mumbai and Hathi Gogaiyan of Ahmedabad online a few months ago. They introduced him to an online hackers’ community on the net and gave him credit card details to make purchases.

“Following Sharma and Gogaiyan’s advice, Purohit tried to book an expensive mobile and i-pod using the data they provided. To his surprise, he received the items within a week. He also couriered the valuables to them as gifts. He started buying more goods online on eBay, an online auction website,” deputy commissioner of police B Vijayakumari said.

Sharma and Gogaiyan had given Purohit details of US credit card holders. Following complaints from an eBay investigation officer, the city police arrested Purohit. He had made his purchases from his personal computer. The police, with the help of the cyber crime wing, tracked down his IP address. Preliminary inquires revealed that this group of hackers got bank accounts and credit card details of people for a price.

“We have received information that the Mumbai police cornered Sharma and Gogaiyan a few days ago for another credit card cheating case in Mumbai. We have taken Purohit into custody to get more details,” a senior police officer said.

Police booked Purohit under several sections of the IPC, including 420 (cheating). He was remanded in judicial custody after being produced before the magistrate court on Tuesday.

May
13th

Hacker exposes six million Chilean’s data to make a point

Posted by

A Chilean hacker posted sensitive information about six million of his compatriots on the Internet, apparently in an act of protest against the government’s lax data security.

According to Chilean newspaper El Mercurio, details including people’s address’, phone numbers, ID numbers, email addresses and even academic records were all laid bare for the world to see on a popular technology blog called FayerWayer. Links to additional information was also posted on a website called “ElAntro”.

The information was mined from various different Chilean government and military sites, including the Ministry of Education, state telephone firms and the Electoral Service website. “Nobody bothers protecting that information”, the hacker allegedly wrote in explanation of why he felt the urge to expose six million of his countrymen to identity theft.

Chilean Police commissioner Jaime Jara told El Mercurio that the police were investigating, however, the fact that it took the slow poke Chilean authorities hours to twig what had happened, and then several more hours to get round to removing the private data, goes quite a way to proving the hacker’s point. µ

L’Inq AFP

Apr
17th

Hackers issue BT Home Hub warning

Posted by

BT Home HubEthical hacking group GNUCitizen.org has warned that the default settings on one of the UK’s most widely used wireless routers is leaving customers open to attack.

The group showed in a blog posting that the BT Home Hub, the wireless router supplied to BT Broadband customers, uses algorithms that make the device easy to crack when in default mode.

Using reverse-engineering techniques the group said that the hub’s Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) keys can be predicted in just 80 guesses, but had decided against making its automated guessing program publicly available.

GNUCitizen’s findings appear to confirm long-term concerns about the security of the WEP encryption protocol.

“It is quite likely that the bad guys can break into your network if you are using the default encryption key. Our advice is to use WPA rather than WEP and change the default encryption key now,” GNUCitizen said.

Responding to the criticisms, BT denied that real-life users of the device were in any serious danger of hack attacks.

“It is important to realise that, although it has been possible to demonstrate a scenario where the hub may be vulnerable, we do not believe it is something that should affect the majority of BT customers in real life,” the company said in a statement.

BT, which has published details on how to more effectively secure the router, said that other operators supplying the Thomson-manufactured device were also affected by the issue.

Apr
16th

Attackers exploit recent Microsoft fix

Posted by

Hackers continue trying to exploit a patched vulnerability in Microsoft’s Graphic Display Interface (GDI), researchers said this week.

Craig Schmugar, threat researcher at McAfee, reported that the first exploit was discovered on Friday, three days after the issue was patched by bulletin MS08-021.
“One method the bad guys use is to take the patch and reverse engineer it,” Schmugar said on Tuesday. “They look at the files on the computer prior to installing the patch and then after, and try to compare the two and see how they can take advantage of the change.”

The exploit – which can permit remote code execution if a user opens a specially crafted EMF or WMF image file – does not affect customers who have installed the updates detailed in MS08-021, said Bill Sisk, security response communications manager for Microsoft.

“By default, Microsoft Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2003, and Windows Server 2008 customers will have this update applied automatically through Automatic Updates,” Sisk said.

Microsoft encourages all customers to apply its most recent security updates to help ensure that their computers are protected from attempted criminal attacks.

Schmugar said that GDI has had vulnerability issues in the past. The fact that Microsoft credited three researchers with discovering the flaw suggests that multiple people were looking for potential problems and more problems could be on the way.

Apr
15th

CEOs targeted by subpoena spam

Posted by

HackersThousands of chief executives in the United States were targeted Monday by new round of phishing emails that claim to contain a subpoena ordering recipients to testify in federal court.

Instead, the executable file said to contain the subpoena actually is an information-stealing trojan, John Bambenek, a handler at the SANS Internet Storm Center and an information security researcher at the University of Illinois in Champaign, told SCMagazineUS.com.

“The idea was a very good one,” he said. “People see a subpoena and they’re like, ‘Oh crap,’ especially a CEO.”

The malicious executable creates a browser-helper object (BHO) and opens a hidden window in Internet Explorer, which communicates with a command-and-control center in Singapore and can install malware such as a keylogger, Bambenek said. The BHO also steals digital certificates installed on the recipient’s computer.

“Since you’re talking about CEOs of companies, that could potentially be big,” he said. “People can authoritatively send out emails or notifications as a CEO of a company and digitally sign them.”

The scammers behind this digital assault were the same individuals responsible for fake emails purporting to be from the Better Business Bureau, he said. However, the senders were sloppy in their latest run.

“If you paid attention, there were lots of clues this wasn’t kosher,” Bambenek said. “The biggest one is that you’re not going to get served over email. The court would simply not take it seriously. You have to be served the old-fashioned way.”

Other giveaways that the email is a hoax include invalid headers, bogus case numbers and grammatical and spelling errors, he said.

The emails, though, come packed with social engineering tactics, including the recipient’s full name, company name and work phone number, which distinguish them from run-of-the-mill junk mail, said Sam Masiello, director of threat management at MX Logic.

“By targeting C-level executives, the technique used in this type of attack is called ‘whaling,’” he said. “It is called whaling because they are trying to get the largest fish that they can on the hook, people who are generally more affluent and stand more to lose, both personally and professionally.”

Apr
14th

Pro-smoking website redirected to ‘baccy free zone

Posted by

HackersHackers attacked the websites of two organisations campaigning against the smoking ban last week, redirecting UK users to the NHS Smokefree site.

The attack, which targeted British organisation Freedom2Choose and Forces International, lasted 11 hours. Freedom2Choose webmaster Steven Cross said the redirect appeared to have been caused by a DNS poisoning attack.

“One hour after the attack we received a phone call about what was happening, but there was not much we could do since it was not our server that had been attacked,” he explained.

Freedom2Choose vice chairman Andy Davis said (without apparent irony): “It appears that Freedom2Choose has annoyed someone high up - it seems they don’t want the truth to get out.”

Both groups claim the smoking bans are based on fraudulent scientific claims about passive smoking. “Five out of six studies show second-hand smoke to be entirely harmless,” says Davis.

A spokeswoman for Freedom2Choose said that the organisation was funded by members and run by volunteers. It has 85 members who pay £10 to join.

Forces International president Stephanie Stahl said: “To redirect our UK visitors to an anti-smoking website shows that the anti-smoking movement must be very nervous about the information our pro-freedom groups provide. Domain names are sacred on the free-spirited information super highway - we trust that those responsible for this serious violation will be identified and held accountable.”

No one has been fingered as the author of the attack but, much to the relief of the tobacco-fanciers, both sites are working now. No matter how healthy the NHS Smokefree site may be, its content will never be as amusing as reading the claims that the smoking ban is a case of “social engineering”, or that the ban in NY is “causing all kinds of problems [and] ‘bad vibes’”

Apr
10th

White hat hackers infiltrate a power grid in one day

Posted by

HackersA team of experts headed by security guru Ira Winkler was hired by an anonymous power company to test the security of a power grid’s network. The door was practically held open for them.

In a matter of hours, the team infiltrated the grid’s supervisory, control and data acquisition (SCADA) networks using simple phishing tools: social engineering and browser exploits.

Social Engineering is seen by many as a glamorized confidence trick. The penetration team checked distribution lists for SCADA user groups, harvested appropriate email addresses, and then employed a simple trick to gain the targeted user’s access. Employees were sent an e-mail about a plan to cut their benefits which included a link to a Web site with “more information.” The address linked to a malware that granted the hackers remote access. The trick was effective within minutes.What could be done given the level of access these white hats obtained would not be limited to simply shutting down a grid, like a group of hackers managed to do for 17 days to a “practice network” in California in 2001. In comments to CNN last year regarding a leaked video of a staged hack that resulted in the self-destruction of a power generator, Joe Weiss of Applied Control Solutions said, “What people had assumed in the past is the worst thing you can do is shut things down. And that’s not necessarily the case. A lot of times the worst thing you can do, for example, is open a valve — have bad things spew out of a valve.”

Winkler says that these SCADA systems suffer the same vulnerabilities any system does that runs on the same standard operating system and server hardware. Companies have perpetuated the weakness of these systems by not performing important software upgrades because they would force downtime.

But a scheduled downtime is no doubt preferable to suffering the consequences of an exploit. Winkler stressed the seriousness of security in these systems while maintaining a lighthearted air to his job, “We had to shut down within hours,” Winkler says, “because it was working too well. We more than proved that they were royally screwed.”

Ten years ago Wired published an article called Hacking the Power Grid, which included the following: “With deregulation, there is an increasing interest in energy futures trades at the commodities exchange on Wall Street. [IBM senior consultant Nick] Simicich said hackers might use social engineering techniques to obtain passwords to computers with access to the networks containing sensitive information from these sources.”

Apparently little has changed in a decade.

Apr
9th

Hack steered Coast Guard e-learning users to al Jazeera site

Posted by

Cost Guard LogoLast summer, hackers manipulated the Coast Guard’s E-Learning system so that users were redirected to a Web site operated by al Jazeera, an Arab news organization, said the service’s chief information officer.

Field information systems security officers informed the Coast Guard Computer Incident Response Team of the problem, and the service took the E-Learning system offline to mitigate risks to its network while the response team conducted an investigation, said Rear Adm. David Glenn, assistant commandant and chief information officer. He spoke at a meeting of the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association in March.

The Coast Guard took down the E-Learning system, used by its 36,000 uniformed and civilian personnel, for 45 days while it conducted the investigation. The service took corrective action to ensure such an incident could not happen again, said Lt. Nadine Santiago, a Coast Guard spokeswoman. She said the Coast Guard took the system down two hours after it discovered traffic had been re-routed to al Jazeera.

Glenn said the redirection of the traffic going to the E-Learning system was the result of cross-site scripting, a well-known security vulnerability that allows hackers to inject code into Web pages. The application program the E-Learning system uses was vulnerable to the hack because of the way the site was coded.

Santiago said the Coast Guard determined that the vulnerability was with the Inquisiq Learning Management System, developed by ICS Learning Group in Severna Park, Md., and used in the E-Learning system’s unit leader development program. Ed Gipple, president of ICS, acknowledged that Inquisiq, which runs on about 50,000 lines of software code, had a bug, which the company now has fixed.

Brian Kleeman, chief technical officer of ICS, said the problem with the E-Learning system started with a Structured Query Language database, which inputs executable code into the system. That eventually executed a cross-site script that directed users to the al Jazeera site. SQL is a standard way to request information from a database.

Kleeman said his company’s fixes now ensure that the executable code cannot be entered into the SQL database.

Glenn said the Coast Guard came away from the incident with some valuable “lessons learned,” starting with the realization that “applications are now the focus of attack.” This means the service needs to conduct a security assessment of all applications running on its network and to adopt new procedures for contracting development of computer applications with a requirement for security testing built in, Glenn said.

Alan Paller, director of research at the SANS Institute in Bethesda, Md., a nonprofit cybersecurity research organization, said any organization that buys a software application should require testing to uncover bugs before taking delivery. The Coast Guard incident also underscores the need for application developers to hire programmers with knowledge of security vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting, he added.

Like other federal agencies and departments, the Coast Guard continues to experience network and system attacks, Glenn said. About 15.3 million inbound e-mails pass through the Coast Guard network gateways every month, and 47,000 of those contain infections or malicious payloads. Outbound e-mails, about 2.8 million a month, are relatively virus free, carrying only 10 infections per month, he said.

The Coast Guard experiences 175 information assurance incidents a month, which Glenn did not elaborate on, and has a defense-in-depth strategy against network attacks. This includes firewalls and routers protected by network gateways, which are monitored by dual network intrusion detection systems. The service also uses an Internet content filtering system and Homeland Security Department systems such as network scanning and security auditing, he added.

Jan
28th

DoS attack by 20 years old hacker, puts Estonia-Russia relations in check

Posted by
Last May, the web sites of a number of high-ranking Estonian politicians and businesses were attacked over a period of several weeks. At the time, relations between Russia and Estonia were chillier than usual, due in part to the Estonian government’s plans to move a World War II-era memorial known as the Bronze Soldier (pictured below at its original location) away from the center of the city and into a cemetery. The country’s plan was controversial, and led to protests that were often led by the country’s ethnic Russian minority. When the cyberattacks occurred, Estonia claimed that Russia was either directly or indirectly involved—an allegation that the Russian government denied. Almost a year later, the Russian government appears to have been telling the truth about its involvement (or lack thereof) in the attacks against Estonia. As InfoWorld reports, an Estonian youth has been arrested for the attacks, and current evidence suggests he was acting independently—prosecutors in Estonia have stated they have no other suspects. Because the attacks were botnet-driven and launched from servers all over the globe, however, it’s impossible to state definitively that only a single individual was involved.

Dmitri Galushkevich, a 20-year-old Estonian student, launched the DoS (denial-of-service) attacks from his own PC last year. Although he’s a native Estonian, Galushkevich was angry over his government’s plans to move the statue, and launched the attack as a means of protesting the decision. The fact that a single angry student was able to impact international relations between two countries is an startling development. Understanding why Estonia and Russia got into a tiff about a war memorial statue in the first place, however, requires that we take a trip down history lane.

American history tends to focus its coverage of World War II on the theaters of combat we participated in. This makes logical sense—but it leaves the story of the eastern front largely untold, and doesn’t begin to explain why the Russians would be upset over Estonia’s movement of a statue nearly 63 years after the war’s end—or why the Estonians would want to move it in the first place.

The Soviet Union occupied Estonia in 1940 as part of the 1939 German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact. Once it held the country (Russia, to this day, insists the USSR was invited into Estonia and did not “occupy” it), extraordinary elections were held with the ballots restricted to pro-Communist choices. The country became a member of the USSR in August 1940—and was promptly invaded and occupied by the Germans in 1941 when that country opened the Eastern Front of the war.

Germany’s eastern front with the USSR was both the longest and the deadliest in worldwide military history. Contemporary estimates on how many Soviet soldiers and civilians died can vary widely, but the median figures suggest that the Red Army lost approximately 10 million men, with an additional 20 million civilian casualties. Soviet casualties and losses dwarfed those of any other nation, and the conflict left an indelible imprint on Russian society.

The war memorials built in Soviet-occupied territories after the war ended weren’t just monuments to the millions of soldiers and civilians killed in the conflict—they were Soviet ideological bulwarks and physical representations of what the Great Patriotic War had cost the motherland.

The majority of Estonians, however, have a different view. To them, the Bronze Soldier was a symbol of 50 years of Soviet and communist oppression—many Estonians, in fact, voluntarily enlisted and fought with the Germans in 1944 once it became apparent that the Soviets were about to reoccupy the country. Combine the two viewpoints with a significant minority of ethnic Russians who still identify with the memorial as a reminder of Soviet sacrifice, and you’ve got a pile of tinder just waiting for a spark.

The fact that a single student was able to trigger such events is particularly ominous when you consider just how many potential flashpoints exist between various countries all over the world. The DoS attack against Estonia is an excellent example of how a cyberattack carried out by a 20-year-old student in response to real-life events further exacerbated an existing problem between two nations.

Posted On Arstechnica By Joel Hruska